Niklas Wallmeier
All research

Working paper2026Expectations and forecasting

A Many-Designs Study of 516 Algorithms Challenges the Predictability of Wisdom of the Crowd Forecast Aggregation

Christian König-Kersting, Yana Litovsky, Robert Böhm, Igor Grossmann, Jürgen Huber, Michael Kirchler and WoCCAP Consortium (One of the research teams in the WoCCAP Consortium; comments on and editing of the manuscript)

University of Innsbruck Working Paper 2026-05

516 algorithms. No sure winner. 129 teams pooled the same forecasts by 1,182 people. Their makers were overconfident about which would win. Schematic, not data. EXPECTED RANK ACTUAL RANK 1122334455667788 favourite winner
A schematic, not data: one dot per algorithm. No algorithmic or researcher characteristic consistently explained accuracy, and researchers overrated how well their own and others' algorithms would do.

In short

129 research teams submitted 516 algorithms to pool the same forecasts. Hardly any approach beat the others in a predictable way.

What we find

Cite

Christian König-Kersting, Yana Litovsky, Robert Böhm, Igor Grossmann, Jürgen Huber, Michael Kirchler and WoCCAP Consortium (2026). “A Many-Designs Study of 516 Algorithms Challenges the Predictability of Wisdom of the Crowd Forecast Aggregation.” University of Innsbruck Working Paper 2026-05.

@techreport{koenigkersting2026many,
  author = {König-Kersting, Christian and Litovsky, Yana and Böhm, Robert and Grossmann, Igor and Huber, Jürgen and Kirchler, Michael and {WoCCAP Consortium}},
  title = {{A Many-Designs Study of 516 Algorithms Challenges the Predictability of Wisdom of the Crowd Forecast Aggregation}},
  year = {2026},
  institution = {Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck},
  type = {University of Innsbruck Working Paper},
  number = {2026-05}
}